-
Posts
2,912 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
60
Content Type
Profiles
Environment News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Simon
-
I completely agree. And we need to remember this as religious and conservative politicans and organisations as well as "pro-life" organisations from the USA are pouring huge amounts of money in Europe to remove the freedoms for women.
-
I don't watch much TV so I have no clue what some of these shows are about.. But I voted for: Band of Brothers, Battlestar Galactica, Dexter, Family Guy, Firefly, Rome, South Park, The Daily Show, The Sopranos and The West Wing I haven't watched all episodes of Rome, The Sopranos and The West Wing or Dexter. But those episodes I've seen I have enjoyed watching. :)
-
The Guardian is holding this little online poll were they ask their readers which TV show from the decade 2000-09 was the best. So I thought let have our own little online poll! You can vote for as many TV shows you want! Here are the contenders: 24 30 Rock Arrested Development Band of Brothers Battlestar Galactica Big Brother Black Books Buffy the Vampire Slayer Curb Your Enthusiasm Deadwood Dexter Doctor Who Extras Family Guy Firefly Flight of the Conchords House Jam Life on Mars Lost Mad Men Oz Peep Show Planet Earth QI Rome Shameless Six Feet Under South Park Spaced Spooks State of Play The Daily Show with Jon Stewart The Office The Shield The Sopranos The Thick of It The West Wing The Wire Top Gear Vote! Vote! Vote! Vote! Vote! Vote! Vote! :cute: If you favorite TV show isn't listed please let us know by posting a reply.
-
Why Drinking Bottled Water is Bad for You and the Environment
Simon replied to Michelle Goes Green's topic in Living Green
I don't understand why people find it hip to drink expensive water which has traveled miles and been sitting in a fridge in some random shop for ages. I rather want fresh water from the tap. -
William McGunn from the Wall Street Journal writes: "The most recent example of anti-birth thinking comes from Paul Murtaugh and Michael Schlax of Oregon State University. In a study called “Reproduction and the carbon legacies of individuals,†they suggest that if you truly care about the environment, it’s not enough to trade your SUV for a Prius, use the right lightbulbs, or limit your lawn to organic fertilizers. To the contrary, you need to start thinking about something way more important: i.e., having one less child. The “basic premise,†the study reports, is that “a person is responsible for emissions of his descendents.†When Mr. Murtaugh runs the numbers, he finds some alarming results. Take an American woman who checks all the green boxes: She recycles, installs energy efficient windows, cuts back how much she drives, and so on. Yet simply by having two children, Prof. Murtaugh reports, she will add nearly 40 times the amount of carbon dioxide emissions she had saved with those lifestyle changes. No wonder the Los Angeles Times Web site reports on this study under the title “Tie Your Tubes and Save the Planet?â€" Yes. People in the West should aim to have fewer children! Why only people in the rich West you may ask? Read: Overpopulation is not the problem - overconsumption by the rich few is
-
GM food safe? Chickens fed GM corn refuse to eat it. "[R]ats fed on GM potatoes suffered from a weakened immune system and stunted growth of their internal organs..." Yet we humans eat this?
-
haha yeah I didn't even notice that. GO SCHOOL! :lol:
-
Your views on the current Israeli aggression in Gaza
Simon replied to Simon's topic in Politics and Current Events
Israel targets human rights groups, In a bid to staunch the flow of damaging evidence of war crimes committed during Israel’s winter assault on Gaza, the Israeli government has launched a campaign to clamp down on human rights groups, both in Israel and abroad. -
They teach these things at school in USA? Amazing... A high school kid fills out his "Abstinence Cartoon Dialog" test with some great drawings. Source: http://www.cslacker.com/images/funny/amazing/abstinence_education_test/ Via: Reddit
-
London to plant 2 million trees by 2025, says mayor's office
Simon replied to Simon's topic in Green Talk
Oh but London is a lovely city (although a bit dirty) and well worth a visit. :) -
I will check it out but I am not sure I will play it. I don't have that much free time and I already got a few other games. By the way, if you like to play pc games you should really try out Steam: http://store.steampowered.com/ It's great!
-
London to plant 2 million trees by 2025, says mayor's office
Simon replied to Simon's topic in Green Talk
Yeah. I was in London for about a week and at the end of my trip my snot was all black... "That said, London is the biggest European city by far, so it does makes sense." Yea, tell me about it! London alone has more people than all of Sweden combined. :whistle: -
Although I am not the biggest fan of mmorpg's it sounds interesting. I google'd it and found some screenshots but the graphics seems a bit crappy.. I could be wrong tho.. Is it a free game?
-
Not a clue. What kind of game is it?
-
The Guardian reports: "The mayor's environment plan is aiming to increase tree cover across the capital by 5% – an extra 2m trees – by 2025.The programme, Leading to a Greener London, also involves plans for an increase in green space in inner London by 5%, including green roofs and more trees in streets. A green roof features waterproofing and drainage layers topped with soil and plants. Other measures to make the capital "greener, cleaner and more civilised" include pilot schemes which will pay householders to recycle. "Trees in streets have a very positive air-quality effect," Dedring added." I've been to London before and I gotta say this is not a moment to late! The air quality is awfully disgusting in London compared to other major cities in Europe.
-
Morning Musume - Twilight http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IANoK9E2pAg
-
France must shut down nuclear plants due to heatwaves
Simon replied to Green Blog's topic in Nuclear Energy
Nuclear energy is madness because it is Expensive, Dangerous, Not Cost-Effective and Will Worsen Climate Change. Simply put: nuclear power is not the answer to our energy and climate crisis. :sceptical: -
Are you planning on going to Copenhagen to protest or watch the UN Climate Change Conference this December – the last chance we have to take action against "the greatest threat the world has ever faced"? Please let me, and everyone else, know if you are planning on going. Maybe we can exchange ideas, tips, thoughts and maybe even help each other out for the Copenhagen visit? I am planning on going to protest and report about everything happening over there on Green Blog. I don't know for how many days I will visit Copenhagen. But I will probably not spend all my days in Denmark. I think I will take the train over the Oresund Bridge, which connects Copenhagen and Sweden, on the morning and then back home to Sweden when the night comes.
-
Thank you. Just out of curiosity what are you reading?
-
Reuters reports: "The United States could save about $600 billion in energy costs by 2020 if it hiked annual efficiency spending about five-fold, business consultants McKinsey and Co said in a report on Wednesday. Governments, businesses and the general public would have to boost annual spending on existing energy-saving measures, like insulating walls and more efficient appliances, from about $10 billion annually to $50 billion per year. The upfront costs would pay off by saving $1.2 trillion by 2020, according to the report called "Unlocking Energy Efficiency in the U.S. Economy."" There's a lot of reasons to go green. About 600 billion reasons! But we better hurry because we no longer have the time on our side.
-
Wahahha! Some people seem to trust their car's GPs more than common sense.
-
George Monbiot, Europe's leading green commentator, gives his rather negative opinion about the British and G8 climate strategy which he says “just doesn’t add upâ€. Monbiot argues that the British climate plan, which the G8 pretty much adopted as its own, is a “mockery†and that it is “very unlikely†to stop a two degrees increase in global temperatures. “According to one person who has read the drafts, the new policies will include buying up to 50% of the reduction from abroad. If this is true, it means that the UK will not cut its greenhouse gases by 80% by 2050, as the government promised. It means it will cut them by 40%. Offsetting half our emissions (which means paying other countries to cut them on our behalf) makes a mockery of the government's climate change programme.†Monbiot writes that “if global justice means anythingâ€, the rich West must of course make deeper cuts than the poorer developing countries. “We have the most to cut and can best afford to forgo opportunities for developmentâ€, Monbiot writes on the Guardian. “Carbon offsetting makes sense if you are seeking a global cut of 5% between now and for ever. It is the cheapest and quickest way of achieving an insignificant reduction. But as soon as you seek substantial cuts, it becomes an unfair, impossible nonsense, the equivalent of pulling yourself off the ground by your whiskers. Yes, let us help poorer nations to reduce deforestation and clean up pollution. But let us not pretend that it lets us off the hook.†It is, like always, worth a read: The rich can relax. We just need the poor world to cut emissions. By 125%
-
Photo credit: christian.senger The Times Online are reporting that France have been forced to close down a third of its nuclear power stations this summer due to heatwaves: “France is being forced to import electricity from Britain to cope with a summer heatwave that has helped to put a third of its nuclear power stations out of action. With temperatures across much of France surging above 30C this week, EDF’s reactors are generating the lowest level of electricity in six years, forcing the state-owned utility to turn to Britain for additional capacity. Fourteen of France’s 19 nuclear power stations are located inland and use river water rather than seawater for cooling. When water temperatures rise, EDF is forced to shut down the reactors to prevent their casings from exceeding 50C.†It seems thirsty nukes can't take the heat and that climate change puts nuclear energy into hot water. A question we must all ask our self: as the planet is warming up, is nuclear really a smart move?
-
Thank you! Yes I like the directory too. But I haven't had enough time lately for it. And this fall I will get even less time for it as I will "go back" to school. Or in this case the University.