Jump to content
Green Blog

The Root of All Evil?


Simon

Recommended Posts

  • 5 months later...

Please edit those links ... cannot see it ...

Sorry about that. Some of the links posted in the forum got messed up when we converted from phpBB3 to IPB... <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have just watched both films. Do not think either side is 100% right or wrong - but worth watching, because it is good to re-question what you believe :thoughtful:

Might put another post on....when I have done more thinking :thoughtful:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have just watched both films. Do not think either side is 100% right or wrong - but worth watching, because it is good to re-question what you believe :thoughtful:

Might put another post on....when I have done more thinking :thoughtful:

Are you a believer? :halo:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Yes while I am Christian and follow some traditions I do not believe what a priest is saying! Not a word. I don't even go to church and I was only present on mass when people got married :D

Down with not the religion and tradition but down with religious institutions !!!

That is my opinon.

I would recommend Zeitgeist to all !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are all believers, even if we believe in non-believing.

"Atheists don't believe in anything, except the power of reasoned rational thought, free investigation and the unfettered human spirit to succeed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Atheists don't believe in anything, except the power of reasoned rational thought, free investigation and the unfettered human spirit to succeed."

Thats a lot of things to believe in :excl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, there is a major differance between reasoned and rational thoughts and to believe (and worship) a god.

There is a saying that the view depends upon which mountain you are stood upon.

As someone who has worked in a scientific research establishment, doing research sponsored by an EEC quango, I find it difficult to accept that science is objective, partly its who pays the piper, partly its how can I make a name for myself (don't let results that do not fit the theory get in the way of a good paper), and partly its what your peer group is expecting - hence, DL Henshaw was a maverick, but is no longer, and Rupert Sheldrake is still a maverick.

I know many people who reason, and weigh all the evidence as objectively as they can, but still come out with silly answers. Because someone is a scientist, does not mean they never come out with silly answers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because someone is a scientist, does not mean they never come out with silly answers.

Many times the come out with the answers that they are PAID to come out with.... :thoughtful:

the more silly the answer, the higher the price!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audience is coming from. To find out more, please read our Privacy Policy. By choosing I Accept, you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies.