It's time for a Green Revolution

Unknown reader to the author :Your argument is compelling, your destiny is written. You will be among the greats that have their names enthroned on a plate on the roof top, on the majestic vanes of a windmill, and on the bumper sticker of an electric car.  Author: I call out to thee, " Who needs starbuck coffee? Who needs a house? Who needs food? Who needs a name plate when the clock is ticking? Who needs a car made of mined material when Mother nature is crying for help?" Consumer: I that am talking to thee am he. I am the one that needs a car. I am the one that needs food. Do not forget me in thy great haste. Let me alone to  feed clothe, and shelter my family before this world ends.  Scientist at Duban: " An article in Science magazine illustrated that a rise in carbon dioxide did not precede a rise in temperatures, but actually lagged behind temperature rises by 200 to 1000 years.  A rise in carbon dioxide levels could not have caused a rise in temperature if it followed the temperature. This suggests that the correlation seen between Co2 and temperature may not be cause and effect determined. Chances are that increased temperature may produce more atmospheric c02, not the other way round.  Author: It is truly heart rendering that such skeptical folly should still exist. Come to greenblog and learn true science, not some outdated article!.  Scientist at Duban:  " Not all food comes from electric cars, not all rain from solar panels, not all life from  oil pipelines, and perhaps not all truth  from green blog. but definately all truth comes from wikipedia! If temperature increase results in more atmospheric  co2, then how would this occur?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C... Carbon dioxide dissolves in the ocean to form carbonic acid (H2CO3), bicarbonate (HCO3-) and carbonate (CO32-), and there is about fifty times as much carbon dissolved in the sea water of the oceans as exists in the atmosphere.Gas solubility decreases as the temperature of water increases leading to higher atmospheric co2 levels given a corresponding temperature increase.  Author:“The relationship is actually very complicated but there is one relationship that is far more powerful than all the others and it is this. When there is more carbon dioxide, the temperature gets warmer, because it traps more heat from the sun inside.†Scientist at Duban:  Yes, but only if one can distinguish between co2 and temperature. One cannot if all he has to go by is a relationship on a chart. Perhaps one way  to solve the delimma is to differentiate between manmade co2 and naturally occuring co2 (say co2 trapped in oceans).In order from man made c02 emissions to cause measurable temperature increases it is necessary to determine whether the increased manmade c02 in the atmosphere results in increased temperature.  Such isolation is made possible with the different isotopes of carbon, C13 and C12 leading to a hypothesis that (obtained fromhttp://wattsupwiththat.com... )The long-term increases in carbon dioxide concentration that have been observed at Mauna Loa since 1958 could be driven more than by the ocean (temperature increase)  than by mankind’s burning of fossil fuels. The question now is not so much as what causes co2 and ways to minimise co2, rather what modulates temperature? That such a mechanism must exist is clear given previously high temperature and c02 levels in the geological history. If such a mechanism had not/does not exist then as temperature had risen co2 levels would have risen feeding back into higher temperature via positive feedback. A barren wilderness in what  is now called earth would have resulted.  What may modulate the earth's temperature and therefore indirectly modulate the release of co2 in the oceans? Perhaps it is the number of computers? Could it be the number of tin roofed houses? Maybe it is the proportion of farmers growing gm food?   It has been suggested by space daily http://www.spacedaily.com/2006... that The earth's climate has been significantly affected by the planet's magnetic field, according to a Danish study published Monday that could challenge the notion that human emissions are responsible for global warming.