Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted
comment_2052

Britain has given the go-ahead for the construction of a new generation of nuclear power stations, in its search for cleaner, greener sources of energy. The government says nuclear power is key to fighting climate change and securing future energy supplies. But not everyone believes it really is a greener alternative.

[youtube:5uygu7nu]

[/youtube:5uygu7nu]
comment_2057

5 times the jobs? Never have I seen that figure, where did it come from. Also, a missing figure is the cost per KW comparing the two. I keep seeing that wind has not reached a low enough cost to make it viable.

  • Author
comment_2061

5 times the jobs? Never have I seen that figure, where did it come from. Also, a missing figure is the cost per KW comparing the two. I keep seeing that wind has not reached a low enough cost to make it viable.

What are you talking about?

comment_2077

He is talking about your signature, i think.

"For the same investment, wind generates 5 times the jobs and 2.3 times the power as a nuclear reactor."

Correct, very interesting comparison, where did it come from? sceptical.gif

comment_2084

I shall post for the subject icon_razz.gif

Nuclear power may be more eco-friendly than fuels as we know them..But it is also so dangerous at its use that if anything goes wrong,the catastrophe afterwards shall be much bigger.

It is better to stick to the safe alternative sources of energy (sun,wind,water) and develop them at the same time,than introducing nuclear power in our life and having such a dangerous thing going on...

  • 2 weeks later...
comment_2109

That quote comes from a recent report from Greenpeace about renewables against nuclear energy. If you want I can try to find it again.

Would be interesting to find the source and how they came up with that - Greenpeace does not seem as well quoted as they used to be.

comment_2113

Did a search and could not find it in either document. Does seem like it could have been in one of them, given both were looking at the economic side of the question.

  • Author
comment_2114

Did a search and could not find it in either document. Does seem like it could have been in one of them, given both were looking at the economic side of the question.

I will see if I can do some more searching.. Hmm I was sure it was from one of those documents..

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Author
comment_2204

Did a search and could not find it in either document. Does seem like it could have been in one of them, given both were looking at the economic side of the question.

Maybe you can find it here: http://www.greenpeace.org/sweden/rappor ... ergy-futur

If not, it might come from a swedish greenpeace report and I have just translated it, some day some time ago..

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Green Blog

Green Blog has been online since 2007. We're a community of people who want to live a greener and more sustainable life.

Join us and start your own green blog, engage in the discussions in our environment forums, and meet new like-minded people.


Green Blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Powered by Invision Community

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audience is coming from. To find out more, please read our Privacy Policy. By choosing I Accept, you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies.