Atomkraft? Nein danke! 50.000 people protest against nuclear energy in Germany

This past weekend around 50 000 people from around Germany protested in Berlin against nuclear energy. The demonstrators protested against threats from the current right wing government to extend a deadline for the country’s 17 nuclear reactors.

“In Berlin an estimated 50,000 people have joined a demonstration against nuclear power in the run-up to the German general elections.

The rally was headed by a convoy of 350 tractors, which drove past the office of Chancellor Angela Merkel,”
Radio Netherlands Worldwide
reports.

Back in 2001 the former Social Democratic chancellor, backed up by the Greens, pushed through a new legislation in 2001 that would phase out nuclear energy from Germany within two decades. But the Social Democratic and Green government lost the election in 2005 to a right-wing coalition consisting of the current Chancellor Angela Merkel's center-right Christian Democrats and the liberal Free Democrats.

Angela Merkel, who successfully blocked a strong climate deal for the European Union last year, now wants to scrap the nuclear phase-out legislation that the SPD pushed through in 2001. This is similar to what is happening in Sweden after a coalition of right-wing parties won the recent election there. According to Merkel, Germany “cannot phase out nuclear energy as quickly as some imagine.”

"But in the long term, that's to say in the second half of the century, we will experience a large amount of renewable energy sources. We are convinced that we will be able to stop using nuclear energy at some point”, Merkel said.

The Social Democratic chancellor candidate, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, is accusing Angela Merkel's center-right Christian Democrats and the liberal Free Democrats "of leading the country into an energy policy dead-end and endangering domestic security."

germany-anti-nuclear-protest-2

On the same day as the anti-nuclear protest in Germany were taking place Greenpeace released a survey which found that 59% of Germans are against Merkel's proposal to extend the deadline for the country’s already aging nuclear reactors.

“Our responsibility is to phase out power plants that endanger the health and livelihoods of future generations, said Greenpeace Finland's nuclear campaigner,
Lauri Myllyvirta
at a speech the Brandenburg Gate.

“Each year nuclear power plants are kept running means more nuclear waste, more uranium mining, higher risk of accidents. There is no excuse: Climate change can be best tackled without nuclear plants. The nuclear phase-out in Germany is one of the reasons for the success of wind and solar energy all over the world. A relapse into nuclear power in Germany would send a very bad signal to other countries.”

Nils Diedrich, a political scientist at Berlin's Free University, says that if Merkel and her right wing coalition manage to push through this pro-nuclear legislation “we'll see a real battle”. He warns that “then there will be massive demonstrations."

Although Germany is one of the leading countries in renewable wind energy it still has a dirty and toxic energy portfolio. 42% of the country’s energy comes from coal and 23% from nuclear energy. Only about 15% of the energy comes from clean renewable energy sources such as wind and solar.

Images from the Gruene.de


Report Article

Article Details

Simon Leufstedt
  • Published:

Share This Story

Follow Green Blog

Subscribe to our RSS feed and stay updated with out latest posts and articles. You can also subscribe to our newsletter and get weekly updates. Follow us on Twitter, Google+ or Facebook.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

User Feedback


Guest Stephan

Posted · Report

Nuclear energy, especially in its current state, is underdeveloped when taking the environment into account. Solar energy is the way to go.

For more info regarding solar energy, have a look at this Green Journal.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest RodAdams

Posted · Report

There is something that critical thinkers should know about Gerhard Schroeder, the Social Democratic chancellor who negotiated the deal to shut down Germany's 17 emission free nuclear power plants well before the end of their useful life.

Within one month after he lost in his reelection bid to Ms. Merkel, he accepted a high level position with Gazprom, the Russian natural gas monopoly, with the responsibility of directing the completion of a gas pipeline under the Baltic Sea directly from Russia to Germany. http://bit.ly/ss8Qo

The gas that the pipeline will carry will be used as part of the replacement power generation capacity. So will the biofuels produced by the farmers who led the protests in Berlin. Both gas and biofuels would have a smaller market at a lower price if the nuclear plants were kept in service.

The dispute is not just about illogical fear of the potential consequences of a nuclear plant accident, it is also about a logical - if slightly immoral - desire to make money by selling goods that would not be needed if the useful plants were not prematurely removed from service. People motivated by greed are apparently is winning the hearts and minds of Germans, even though the result will be that they will pay higher prices for dirtier electricity than they would if the plants kept running.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Simon Leufstedt

Posted · Report

"Within one month after he lost in his reelection bid to Ms. Merkel, he accepted a high level position with Gazprom, the Russian natural gas monopoly, with the responsibility of directing the completion of a gas pipeline under the Baltic Sea directly from Russia to Germany."

Yes you are correct. And in my opinion that is morally wrong.

But that doesn't take away the fact that Nuclear energy is Expensive, Dangerous, Not Cost-Effective and Will Worsen Climate Change. Simply put: nuclear power is not the answer to our energy and climate crisis.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest RodAdams

Posted · Report

Simon - the facts do not back up your assertions. Even your links are to documents that talk about the cost of future plants - which is a topic ripe for endless discussion because no one knows how much they might cost. That a debate topic where anyone is allowed to assert almost anything, after all, it is about the future.

When it comes to a discussion about keeping 17 well built, well operated EXISTING nuclear plants running until they are at the end of their useful lives, the discussion about cost is something entirely different. According to page 39 of a book titled "Risks and benefits of nuclear energy" (available on Google Books with a very complex link) here are the costs of various forms of electricity in Germany in 2003 in euro cents per kilowatt-hour:

Lignite - 3.3

Hard coal - 3.0

Oil - 3.1

Gas - 3.6

Nuclear - 2.1

Hydro - 7

Wind - 7

Solar PB - 60 (that is right, sixty cents per kilowatt hour!)

These costs come from actual accounting data on real plants. They are not figments of someone's imagination or predictions of the future.

My reason for introducing Schroeder's betrayal into the discussion is that it should cause one to question why he was so adamant about shutting down those already constructed plants. Causing a market demand for Russian natural gas at a time when he might have been negotiating in private for a lucrative private position after "serving" as Chancellor just might be a logical explanation for his actions, especially when you find out just how greedy he was for personal wealth and status symbols.

Say what you will about future nuclear plants; it is hard to assert that the existing ones are expensive to run or cause greenhouse gas emission. Heck, there are some places where governments have threatened to slap a windfall profits tax on nuclear electricity generators because they are so profitable when selling electricity in a competitive market whose price is set by natural gas or in a market where coal plants have to purchase emissions credits.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

One correction: Actually the Social Democratic Party still shares power with Angela Merkel's conservative party. So there is no conservative coalition in Germany. I am afraid that there will be after the elections on 9/27.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest fj198602

Posted · Report

            <a href=“ http://www.ourshoesbox.com/â€>Christian Louboutin|<a href=“ http://www.new-fashion.orgâ€>Louboutin shoes|<a href=“ http://www.oursbag.comâ€>Louis Vuitton

Come here!!!

     http://www.ourshoesbox.com/

     http://www.oursbag.com/

     http://www.new-fashion.org/

    <a href=“ http://www.ourshoesbox.comâ€>Christian Louboutin shoes,Yves Saint Laurent shoes,Giuseppe Zanotti shoes,Manolo Blahnik shoes,<a href=“ http://www.new-fashion.org/jimmy-choo-c-27.html... Choo,Free shipping,sell luxury in low price.And <a href=“ http://www.oursbag.comâ€>ouis Vuitton (<a href=“ http://www.oursbag.comâ€>LV),Chanel,handbags,<a href=“ http://www.new-fashion.org/miu-miu-c-32.html>Miu Miu bag and designer handbags, Free Shipping,sell the luxury in low price.Sell 100% Genuine <a href=“ http://www.oursbag.com/gucci-bags-c-24.htmlâ€>Gucci Fashion Handbags,<a href=“ http://www.oursbag.com/chanel-bags-c-23.htmlâ€>c... Fashion Handbags,<a href=“ http://www.oursbag.com/louis-vuitton-bags-c-22.... Vuitton Bags Coach Fashion Bag LV <a href=“ http://www.ourshoesbox.com/christian-louboutin-... Louboutin Fashion Shoes in low price.

    <a href=“ http://www.new-fashion.orgâ€>Christian Louboutin,<a href=“ http://www.ourshoesbox.comâ€>Christian Louboutin boots,Christian Louboutin high heels,<a href=“ http://www.ourshoesbox.com/christian-louboutin-... Louboutin heels,Christian louboutin shoes,high boots,high heels,knee boots,Louis Vuitton,Louis Vuitton handbags,Louis Vuitton tote bag,Louis Vuitton leather bag,<a href=“ http://www.new-fashion.org/australia-c-28.htmlâ€... Australia?<a href=“ http://www.new-fashion.org/miu-miu-c-32.htmlâ€>Miu Miu,Chanel,<a href=“ http://www.oursbag.com/chanel-bags-chanel-2010-... New handbags,Chanel tote bag,<a href=“ http://www.oursbag.com/chanel-bags-c-23.htmlâ€>C... leather bag,chanel designer handbags.<a href=“ http://www.new-fashion.org/christian-louboutin-... Louboutin,Louis Vuitton,Chanel handbag,<a href=“ http://www.oursbag.com/louis-vuitton-bags-leath... Epi Leather Bags.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites


Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now